You can run the review on numbers instead of a feeling.
How many conversations happened, how many were relevant, what the conversion rate is and whether it is climbing. Nobody collects it by hand and nobody shades it, because it fills itself.
Current continuously · No manual reporting · Down to individual conversations
Four numbers across the top and one curve underneath.
More than this a manager does not need on a campaign, and less would not do.
A drawn schematic, not a screenshot. We walk the real interface on the demo.
- VolumeHow many conversations the agent actually had. The base everything else is measured against.
- RelevantHow many passed your criteria. The gap between volume and relevance is the entire point of qualifying.
- Conversion rateCyan, because it is live data. This is the number that moves and the one you tune against.
- A trend, not a snapshotOne number says nothing. The curve says whether the last change to the setup worked.
What the overview shows.
How many the agent ran, how many finished, how many are still open.
How many contacts passed qualifying and how many the agent turned down.
The share of conversations that ended in a booked meeting.
How those numbers move after each change to the setup.
A campaign nobody measures cannot be defended either.
Without numbers the sales budget gets decided on whoever remembers what. This is the part of the product that only lands with the person who has to justify the result to somebody else.
The rest of the platform.
Eight things behind Alex and Bea. This is one of them.
What people ask about this part.
Can we get to individual conversations?
Yes. From any number you can reach the conversations behind it and read them in full.
Can it be exported?
Contacts and the communication history, yes. If you need the figures inside your own reporting, we go through exactly what makes sense to pull on the demo.
Can the whole team see it?
Users are unlimited on every plan, so anyone you give access to has it. You never pay for a team member.